stress
Mohammad Mehdi Pasandideh; Faraunak SaulekMahdee
Abstract
Objective: Gastrointestinal diseases is among the most important and common chronic non communicable diseases that imposes a lotof Economic and psychological burden on the society and health system. Regarding this the ...
Read More
Objective: Gastrointestinal diseases is among the most important and common chronic non communicable diseases that imposes a lotof Economic and psychological burden on the society and health system. Regarding this the aim of present study was to compare perceived stress , emotion regulation strategies and Cognitive Flexibility in Gastrointestinal patients and Normal individuals. Method: The present study was a comparative study and Statistical population in this study includes all Gastrointestinal patients in the gastroenterology private clinics of Bandar Anzali during the period of April & May in 2018 and their fellows that among Them ,184 people , 92 patients & 92 fellows ,were selected in the available sample method and completed the questionnaire of personal information perceived stress of cohen and et al (1983), the emotion regulation strategies of Gross & john (2003) and Dennis & Vander Wal ( 2010) Cognitive Flexibility responde. Results: The results of multivariate analysis of variance showed that there was a significant difference between the 2 groups in perceived stress components, Cognitive Flexibility & perceived controllability (subscales of Cognitive Flexibility).Conclusion: Based on the results of this study , consideration of related psychological dimensions. Gastrointestinal diseases especially stress and Cognitive Flexibility , are of great importance.
Mohammad Mehdi Pasandideh; Leila Zare
Volume 5, Issue 20 , January 2017, , Pages 88-108
Abstract
Objective: This research aims at shedding light on well-being psychiatric aspects of resiliency and sense of humour between patients who suffer from coronary artery disease and healthy individuals. Method: The methodology employed is ex-post facto and the study population includes two groups of patients ...
Read More
Objective: This research aims at shedding light on well-being psychiatric aspects of resiliency and sense of humour between patients who suffer from coronary artery disease and healthy individuals. Method: The methodology employed is ex-post facto and the study population includes two groups of patients and healthy individuals who live in Rasht. The samples under investigation consist of two hundred participants (one hundred individuals who suffer from coronary artery disease and one hundred healthy individuals) who were examined using Well-being Organisationresiliency and sense of humour questionnaire. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS-ver20, descriptive statistics and variance analysis. Results: According to results obtained, it is proved that there is a significant difference between the two above mentioned groups from a psychiatric perspective of well- being. Regarding the gender of the two groups, it is shown that there is also a meaningful difference between the patients and healthy individuals. Considering resiliency, it is revealed that there is a meaningful difference between the two groups, but there is no significant difference between female patients and female non-patients. Conclusion: the findings of the research indicate that from the psychiatric aspect of well- being, patients who suffer from coronary artery disease have less average of resiliency and sense of humour in comparison to healthy individuals and gender is an important aspect of it as well.
